Search found 4 matches
- Wed Jul 22, 2009 9:40 am
- Forum: Site Information
- Topic: Questions about Contributing to the Database
- Replies: 12
- Views: 34236
Old Skool and New Skool
I like the fact that the 1993 New Pulsar is clunky and more analog compared to games with whizbang LCDs. Both are cool in different ways. The other machines are more recent Takasago machines. Perhaps I should not mention this, but not one of these machines costs over $50 and they work. The New Pulsa...
- Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:30 pm
- Forum: Site Information
- Topic: Questions about Contributing to the Database
- Replies: 12
- Views: 34236
30 Days Seems Reasonable
30 days makes good sense. Having a blast exploring this thing, anyway. I am also talking with a gent who has three pachis for sale, so perhaps I will have more than one review. Thanks!
- Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:19 pm
- Forum: Site Information
- Topic: Questions about Contributing to the Database
- Replies: 12
- Views: 34236
Thank God We are Typing Cause I Can't Hear a Thing.
Thanks to all for clarifying the home volume issue. It's safe to say that, at the lowest volume setting, this thing would be great for an apartment of, say, 5,000 square feet. At full volume, you can play slots next to a jet engine on full afterburner comfortably. I like that.
- Mon Jul 20, 2009 6:47 pm
- Forum: Site Information
- Topic: Questions about Contributing to the Database
- Replies: 12
- Views: 34236
Questions about Contributing to the Database
I am going to contribute a review of my 93 New Pulsar, but I wondered two things. It's my first pachi, so I have nothing to compare it with - yet. Given this, my review won't be from a seasoned knowledgable perspective, but rather from a new excitable novice persepective. Is that okay? (After all, t...